Huck's Army Forum :: Faith, Family & Freedom
http://www.forum.hucksarmy.com/

Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012
http://www.forum.hucksarmy.com/viewtopic.php?f=143&t=25914
Page 1 of 4

Author:  californiaforhuck [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

What do you think the chances of this would be?

I would love to see this if Huckabee does not run.

Cains fumbles, newt rises as the anti Romney and Newt has better ideas then Romney.

Christopher

Author:  FirstCoastTerp [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

definitely prefer Newt over Romney and Mike would be a good choice for him

Author:  higgybaby4huck [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

I see Newt selecting an Alan West or Marco Rubio instead. Would love to see it but Newt probably would need Alan West for his Military bona fides or Marco Rubio for the opportunity to destroy Obama in the Latino vote.

Author:  Grandville [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

If Mike isn't running for President then I would hope for Newt picking Mike as his VP. I don't see Mike with Romney and I hope Romney doesn't win the nomination. I don't feel comfortable with Cain. He doesn't seem to be able to present any in depth answers. I think Mike would really compliment Newt with his personality to Newt's ideas. Also, Mike would be able to smartly discuss Newt's ideas with his great knowledge of the issues and his ability to communicate.

Author:  karrboy84 [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

This has been my top ticket since the cain surge...i knew Huck couldnt really get back in with Cain doing so well (they have alot of similarities....and alot of differences), and there was no way I was voting for someone with 0 days political experience. Gingrich-Huckabee would be sick....clearly the top two orators in the entire GOP and maybe a couple of the smartest. Sounds like a plan.

Author:  dadof5 [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

On experience and debating ability Newt can handle it. We do not need another on the job training president. Newt lacks one major thing....he needs the social conservatives.....the south.....and the Christian vote. Huckabee would be a brilliant VP because he could handle the media and be an incredible support for a president. If he gets the VP nod it would work out better than being president now. 8 years with newt.....8 more as president.....sweet 16 years with Huck being in the highest offices in the land. :P :P :P

Author:  TheValuesVoter [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

Here's a question for the group.

My guy is Huckabee. I suppose that my second choice of the folks in the field would still be Santorum. I have nothing against either Cain or Gingrich. I sort of like and respect them both.

However, if someone is put off by the possibility that Cain could have committed an impropriety in the form of sexual harrassment, how could the person be okay with former Speaker Gingrich, who is now married to a woman who he was involved with in an extramarital affair AND who was at the time of the affair a staffer in the House of Representatives at the same time that Newt was the Speaker of the House of Represantatives?. Legally speaking, apart from the severe moral inappropriateness of the situation, the working relationship between former Speaker Gingrich and fomer House Staffer Callista Bisek could raise questions about an inappropriate relationship between a leader and an indirect subordinate (which is against HR policy in many organizations - because it can be construed as a form of sexual harrassment - either from the subordinate or from another employee. It's messy and many companies want no part of this potential mess). I guess my question is, if one has a problem with the possibility that Cain has done something inappropriate how can one not have a problem with the fact that Gingrich definitely did something inappropriate?

Author:  dadof5 [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

That is why Newt needs Huck.....it would give him credibility. Nothing would dampen the sour attitude toward Newt's personal life than having Huckabee as his VP. Huck has incredible integrity and even liberals respect him.

Author:  TheValuesVoter [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

dadof5 wrote:
That is why Newt needs Huck.....it would give him credibility. Nothing would dampen the sour attitude toward Newt's personal life than having Huckabee as his VP. Huck has incredible integrity and even liberals respect him.


I'm really not sure that the personal credibility of the Vice President helps the President all that much - either in terms of public perception or in terms of actually keeping out of trouble.

Long before the nation knew about Monica Lewinsky, there had been rumors about Clinton's history of womanizing. The fact that Al Gore, to the best of anyone's knowledge, didn't fall into that category didn't help Clinton either have a better reputation or to help him stay out of trouble.

Former President Warren Harding was both a womanier and a guy with a weakness for corrupt cronies. His Vice President, Calvin Coolidge, was neither a womanizer or in the least bit corrupt. Harding still got in trouble, although mostly posthumously, and having a decent man as the number two did nothing to really help him stay out of trouble.

Likewise, FDR had a woman on the side and actually died in her presence. His last Vice President, Truman, probably never even came close to cheating on his wife.

I think it's extremely important that the Vice President be a morally solid guy or gal. But having someone who has a history of doing the right thing in the number two position is no substitute for having a person who has a history of doing the right thing in the number one position, in my opinion. I don't think that moral character transfers between the two members of a ticket, I don't think it changes the opinion that voters have toward the other member, and I don't think it keeps the other person from doing whatever they're inclined to do.

Author:  WhatsNotToLike? [ Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

Okay, I realize this is coming straight from Fantasy Island, but IMO, if any one of the current candidates had 2 brain cells to rub together, (s)he would immediately make the following announcement:

"If you choose me as the GOP nominee, I will do my utmost to convince Gov. Mike Huckabee to be my running mate."

He's been thoroughly and repeatedly vetted. He's nationally known, and liked! He adds to almost every ticket out there (think of how many of the current crop would love to have his "everyman" sense, his communication skills, his likability, his genius!). He'd mop the floor in a VP debate. What's Not To Like?

Only one downfall I can see....on the campaign trail, everyone would be saying, "Why aren't we electing this guy as POTUS?"

Author:  QuoVadisAnima [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

TheValuesVoter wrote:
Here's a question for the group.

My guy is Huckabee. I suppose that my second choice of the folks in the field would still be Santorum. I have nothing against either Cain or Gingrich. I sort of like and respect them both.

However, if someone is put off by the possibility that Cain could have committed an impropriety in the form of sexual harrassment, how could the person be okay with former Speaker Gingrich, who is now married to a woman who he was involved with in an extramarital affair AND who was at the time of the affair a staffer in the House of Representatives at the same time that Newt was the Speaker of the House of Represantatives?. Legally speaking, apart from the severe moral inappropriateness of the situation, the working relationship between former Speaker Gingrich and fomer House Staffer Callista Bisek could raise questions about an inappropriate relationship between a leader and an indirect subordinate (which is against HR policy in many organizations - because it can be construed as a form of sexual harrassment - either from the subordinate or from another employee. It's messy and many companies want no part of this potential mess). I guess my question is, if one has a problem with the possibility that Cain has done something inappropriate how can one not have a problem with the fact that Gingrich definitely did something inappropriate?
If we were comparing Cain's situation to that of Gingrich a decade or so ago, you would have a point. We would only be able to compare experience & ability - neither could claim any morally superior ground. But that is not the case.

However, Gingrich has since gone thru the motions of repenting & confessing his sins, & attempting to get right with God. Only God knows the sincerity of his contrition. IF Cain is guilty, then he is still trying to cover up his sins with more sins, & he still needs to repent & beg God's forgiveness.

And really, using one's position as a superior to coerce a reluctant subordinate into an intimate relationship is certainly a graver sin than dallying with a willing co-worker.

Author:  TheValuesVoter [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

QuoVadisAnima wrote:
If we were comparing Cain's situation to that of Gingrich a decade or so ago, you would have a point. We would only be able to compare experience & ability - neither could claim any morally superior ground. But that is not the case.

However, Gingrich has since gone thru the motions of repenting & confessing his sins, & attempting to get right with God. Only God knows the sincerity of his contrition. IF Cain is guilty, then he is still trying to cover up his sins with more sins, & he still needs to repent & beg God's forgiveness.

And really, using one's position as a superior to coerce a reluctant subordinate into an intimate relationship is certainly a graver sin than dallying with a willing co-worker.


It's not my place to judge anyone personally. I don't know what is in either of their hearts and it's not my business to decide who has repented and who hasn't.

Having said that, though, I have a hard time figuring out Gingrich's situation because he's married to the woman he cheated on his previous wife with. I'm not sure how that relates to repentence. Also, when I heard him say that he got into trouble because of his service to his country, to me that did not totally sound like something that I'd expect from someone who is taking responsibility for their actions. Again, I have nothing against Gingrich personally and respect him for his intellect. That's just how I see it.

Also, if Cain did do this - whatever "this" is - to an unwilling subordinate, that would indeed be very bad and can't be defended. However, I don't think it's accurate to describe the relationship between Gingrich and his wife as "co-workers." They weren't co-workers. He was the United States Speaker of the House of Representatives and she was a House staffer. There was an absolute hierarchy to their working relationship and he was the seniormost person in that institution and was third in line for the Presidency, an elected representative. She was a staffer, an employee. Furthermore, what followed was not a matter of inappropriate words or jokes but an inapprorpiate and adulterous relationship.

I'm not defending either the actions that Cain is accused of or the actions that Gingrich has admitted to. I'm saying that both the actions that Cain is accused of comitting as well as those that we know Gingrich committed are very bad in different ways. And, if the Cain allegations turn out to be true, I think that a person can either choose to overlook both his behavior and Gingrich's or choose to reject both of their behaviors. But I don't think I completely understand the idea of being okay with one of these guys but not the other. If Cain actually did do something, their actions would be different, but, in my mind, not different enough.

Author:  nrobyar [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

I dont have a problem with the allegations so much as the way Cain has handled, or rather mishandled, the situation. I never planned to vote for him anyway because, though I like him, I had a real problem with him having never held any political office. I know some said that could be a plus, but not to me. I prefer a governor but Newt Gingrich has been around for so long, worked for Reagan and he certainly knows what he is doing. He is not someone Im excited about (like with Gov. Huckabee) but I could vote for him. I think he has the best shot at beating Obama.....

Author:  nrobyar [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

The only chance we have of having Governor Huckabee chosen as vp is for Newt to do it....They are good friends, Huck could certainly excite the base, shore up the social conservatives and add some personality to the ticket....It could happen with Newt...I don't see it with anyone else.

Author:  Southern Doc [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

nrobyar wrote:
The only chance we have of having Governor Huckabee chosen as vp is for Newt to do it....They are good friends, Huck could certainly excite the base, shore up the social conservatives and add some personality to the ticket....It could happen with Newt...I don't see it with anyone else.


Rationally you are right. Historically though the VP choice has been the ultimate example of how "politics makes strange bedfellows."

The "advantages" of Huck on a number of tickets could be great. But the calculus of "advantage" and "disadvantage" will depend on the thinking (or lack thereof) of the Presidential nominee.

Author:  dadof5 [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

You guys make some great points. My question is..... if through the primary process a candidate does not have enough delegates to assure the nomination....what happens at the convention? Do we have any history on this actually happening?

Author:  QuoVadisAnima [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

TheValuesVoter wrote:
QuoVadisAnima wrote:
If we were comparing Cain's situation to that of Gingrich a decade or so ago, you would have a point. We would only be able to compare experience & ability - neither could claim any morally superior ground. But that is not the case.

However, Gingrich has since gone thru the motions of repenting & confessing his sins, & attempting to get right with God. Only God knows the sincerity of his contrition. IF Cain is guilty, then he is still trying to cover up his sins with more sins, & he still needs to repent & beg God's forgiveness.

And really, using one's position as a superior to coerce a reluctant subordinate into an intimate relationship is certainly a graver sin than dallying with a willing co-worker.


It's not my place to judge anyone personally. I don't know what is in either of their hearts and it's not my business to decide who has repented and who hasn't.

Having said that, though, I have a hard time figuring out Gingrich's situation because he's married to the woman he cheated on his previous wife with. I'm not sure how that relates to repentence. Also, when I heard him say that he got into trouble because of his service to his country, to me that did not totally sound like something that I'd expect from someone who is taking responsibility for their actions. Again, I have nothing against Gingrich personally and respect him for his intellect. That's just how I see it.

Also, if Cain did do this - whatever "this" is - to an unwilling subordinate, that would indeed be very bad and can't be defended. However, I don't think it's accurate to describe the relationship between Gingrich and his wife as "co-workers." They weren't co-workers. He was the United States Speaker of the House of Representatives and she was a House staffer. There was an absolute hierarchy to their working relationship and he was the seniormost person in that institution and was third in line for the Presidency, an elected representative. She was a staffer, an employee. Furthermore, what followed was not a matter of inappropriate words or jokes but an inapprorpiate and adulterous relationship.

I'm not defending either the actions that Cain is accused of or the actions that Gingrich has admitted to. I'm saying that both the actions that Cain is accused of comitting as well as those that we know Gingrich committed are very bad in different ways. And, if the Cain allegations turn out to be true, I think that a person can either choose to overlook both his behavior and Gingrich's or choose to reject both of their behaviors. But I don't think I completely understand the idea of being okay with one of these guys but not the other. If Cain actually did do something, their actions would be different, but, in my mind, not different enough.
Sexual harrassment that ends with someone filing a complaint generally stops at inappropriate words and actions, but that is not necessarily the case without that step so we cannot give credit to Cain for not going further just because he wasn't given the opportunity to push things further.

I won't deny having my doubts about Gingrich's new-found religion; I just don't feel we have enough to convict him of insincerity at this point. And I did mis-speak (or mis-type, I guess) when I said "co-worker", but the essential point is unchanged -- a person does not marry the superior who is sexually harrassing them.

Gingrich marrying Calista could be considered part of making things right depending on the rest of his situation - something only his confessor and/or spiritual director would know.

I also think you might be assuming more good will towards Gingrich than many who are considering voting for him actually possess - clearly he is few people's first, or even second, choice. This is a mud fence comparison - a situation where most people are looking at Gingrich in comparison to Romney, Perry, and Cain and viewing him as preferable to those others. So, for most of us, it's a case of Gingrich being acceptable only relative to those guys.

Author:  ConservTexan [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

I had a hard time voting for McCain knowing that he cheated on his wife with Cindy who he then married.

I am having a harder time wrapping my mind around voting for Gingrich who cheated on wife number 1 with a woman who became wife number 2 who he cheated on with a woman who is now wife number 3.

Character matters to me.

Author:  QuoVadisAnima [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

Please believe me when I say that it matters to me, too. But really, when we look at our options, would you suggest that the characters of Romney, Perry or Cain are superior?

Even Cain with his pro-life $ and without the current allegations he's fighting did not impress me on that level. He reminds me of too many people I have known who were overly impressed with themselves. Those are the people who make the worst mistakes. And I have noticed that Mrs. Marple's theory of relative-ity generally holds true! (ie. when a person reminds you of someone else you know, they are typically alike in character as well)

So where else do we go if we want to stop Obama? Is there a better option that I've missed?

Author:  Miserere [ Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Newt Gingrich/ Huckabee 2012

Speaking of Ms Marple, I'd vote for her ahead of any of these candidates. Of course, citizenship issues might be problematic...

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/