Hucks Army - Faith. Family. Freedom. [Grassroots] JOIN HUCKS ARMY | GET INVOLVED | FUNDRAISING | LINKS | LEADERSHIP | ABOUT
It is currently Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:26 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:07 am 
Offline
*** General
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:42 pm
Posts: 1324
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Likes: 0
Liked: 7
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=96659

Steele Republicans: Like overage whores
by Alan Keyes
Image
Posted: May 01, 2009
1:00 am Eastern

Quote:
I chuckled ruefully when I read a fundraising e-mail from GOP Chairman Michael Steele overflowing with outrage about Arlen Specter's switch to the Democratic Party. In it Steele says that "Arlen Specter committed a purely political and self-serving act. He simply believes he has a better chance of saving his political hide and his job as a Democrat. … Arlen Specter has put his loyalty to his own political career above his duty to his state and nation."

I couldn't help but think of Michael Steele's interview with Fox News' Chris Wallace as he took the reins of the RNC, in which he declared, "I wanted to make it very clear from the very beginning, my goal is to move this party forward. We're in the business of winning elections. And so I'm expecting my grass-roots, my state parties, the national organization to get on board, to get on the page that is a winning page and move forward." Now he faults Specter for taking this very attitude. Specter might say: "My goal is to move myself forward. I'm in the business of winning elections. I expect this switch to put me on the page that is a winning page."

As I pointed out in an article I posted shortly after the Wallace interview, Steele makes clear to Wallace that his aim is to make the Republican Party a happy home for politicians with Specter's views. While mouthing throwaway lines with ornamental references to principle, he announces that issues of constitutional and moral principle will be thrown off the Republican bus while the party focuses on economic issues, which he called the "80-percent issues out there that we can work with those within our party and outside our party and create a new bridge and a new opportunity."

Get the book Rush has been raving about, Mark Levin's "Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto"

Steele has no problem sacrificing principle in order to keep politicians like Specter in the GOP ranks. He sees them as the key to victory and he has made it clear that, as far as he's concerned, winning is the only thing that matters. Unfortunately for him, Specter's switch is entirely consistent with that principle. Specter has rightly concluded that Republican primary voters will reject him in 2010, as they would have in 2004 had it not been for the help he received from Rick Santorum and others who put party loyalty above their commitment to the nation's fundamental moral principles. By running as a Democrat, Specter feels that he stands a better chance of winning the general election. As far as principle goes, the only difference between Specter and Steele is that Specter will now reach for victory while being true to his leftist views. Meantime, the Michael Steele Republicans, as they fume over his desertion, further demonstrate their willingness to seek victory by betraying the party's supposed conservatism.

Given this demonstration, principled conservatives would do well to consider the real lesson of Specter's departure from the Republican ranks. Despite all their whoring after pro-abortion leftists like Specter, the Michael Steele Republicans suffer the fate of overage streetwalkers. Sacrificing their last shreds of decency, they have flaunted their jaded wares for those whose lust for power leads them to look for fresher prospects elsewhere. In the process they seduced politicians capable of better character (like Rick Santorum) into compromising situations that estrange them from their true political kin. I ask sincere conservatives still mesmerized by the cosmetic virtues of the Republican platform this simple question: Why are decent folk like you gawking at made-up streetwalkers when you should be elsewhere, making a home where innocent life is respected, family still means something and God's name is not treated like an obscenity? Why are you still lying to yourselves about the Steele Republicans' intentions, even as their present outrage proves how eagerly they lust after those whose only virtue is their sincere commitment to the corrupt political and moral spirit of our times?

Arlen Specter has ended the charade of his association with the Republicans in a way that highlights the long charade of the GOP's association with conservative views and principles. Specter and the Steele Republicans have one thing in common – their passion for power. What if conservatives were as single-minded in their devotion to the Constitution and the moral principles that underlie America's liberty, strength and prosperity? I suspect that if conservatives ceased to hang their hopes on the false promises of a party obsessed with pleasing its opposite number, they would finally realize their true strength at the polls. They could in one embrace clasp principle and victory; not by continued subservience to the Republicans in name only, but by uncompromised and consistent service to the republic their name commits them to conserve.

I attended several "tea party" events last month. Apart from the large turnouts, I noticed that the prevalent concern among the crowds wasn't with partisan victory, or even with their own economic situation. It was concern about the survival of the American Constitution and American liberty. Millions of Americans realize that socialist economics, pervasive government control and rampant greed and self-indulgence are inconsistent with our survival as a free people. They reject the Obama faction's bid for unchecked power, but they also reject the unprincipled Republicans whose biggest regret is that they lost power, not that they squandered the opportunity to defend and strengthen liberty while they had it. They know that neither party represents the moral or political sovereignty of the American people.

Some conservatives think they can fix the Republican Party. However, the events of the past 20 years suggest that they are more likely to be manipulated by unprincipled Republican power addicts just looking for their next fix. I think such conservatives are focused on the wrong challenge. America must be our main concern now, not either of these self-serving, falsely labeled factions. People who believe in liberty and the Constitution must not go on being passive consumers of figurehead leadership, produced and imposed by special interests who scheme to deceive and control us, abusing our money and our confidence while in fact they serve only themselves. Just as grass-roots Americans came together for the tea party events, we must now work together to create an ongoing vehicle for citizen action that puts the people back in charge of this nation's political affairs. We must resolve to be the creators of representation whose only ambition is to serve and preserve American liberty. By so doing we will renew the effective foundations of the government of, by and for the people that we are duty bound to pass on to our offspring.

_________________
“The central message is that the Republican Party has a great future, if we get back to being the party of principle, clarity and conviction. And we’re going to do that.” --Mike Huckabee


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:16 am 
Offline
** General

Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:58 pm
Posts: 1234
Likes: 0
Liked: 0
Keyes may have a valid point or two.

Unfortunately, I use the ignore button on him because he has shown that he is more interested in getting a name for himself than for actually accomplishing anything good for the nation.

_________________
*** President Huckabee 2012 Blog ***


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2009 11:32 am 
Offline
***** General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:58 am
Posts: 3019
Likes: 0
Liked: 190
I listened to some of the interviews he gave about Obama on youtube and I was very impressed with his ability to call it like it is. He doesn't need to worry about being called a racist so he can come on strong against Obama. He made good points in those interviews and he called Obama's views on abortion an abomination. He also implied his economic views were insane. Sounds right on the money to me.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2009 11:52 am 
Offline
General
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:45 am
Posts: 1175
Likes: 0
Liked: 3
Sounds to me like Keyes is setting himself up as a leader for a 3rd Party.

_________________
______________________Image______________________


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2009 11:53 am 
Offline
Brigadier Geneal

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:49 pm
Posts: 641
Location: Loganville, GA
Likes: 0
Liked: 11
I really wish the Republicans would just go the way of the Whigs, and let a truly conservative party take their place. There really is little difference in Dems and Republicans anymore.

I heard a senator being interviewed the other day on a talkshow . . . I think Medved, but I forget . . . and he repeated that old line, "Elections have consequences." He meant it to say that voters would realize the mistake that they made with Obama and come back to the Republicans when things get out of hand. That ticked me off. Yes, elections have consequences, and the consequence of THEIR idiocy was the election of Obama. Now, there SHOULD be consequences to his election, but it isn't that we go back to the Republicans. It should be that they come back to us.

If not, throw the bums out. I've had about as much too-faced "support the lesser of the two evils" as I can stand. The most insightful thing Huckabee ever said was that we should never sacrifice our principles for someone else's politics. Amen to that. I think Keyes is right on here. Republicans can keep chasing leftists. Let them be shocked when I don't vote for them even after Obama rapes this country with his socialistic agenda.

_________________
To Give a Reason for the Hope - a practical, twelve week, online series to help Christians effectively defend and share their faith.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2009 11:56 am 
Offline
Lieutenant General

Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:35 am
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Liked: 24
joyman25 wrote:
Keyes may have a valid point or two.

Unfortunately, I use the ignore button on him because he has shown that he is more interested in getting a name for himself than for actually accomplishing anything good for the nation.



It's hard to accomplish "anything good" when you're completely ignored by republicans and the MSM. Much like, Ron Paul, Keyes believes in the absolute authority of the Constitution and therefore he is blackballed by many republicans. We all know the republican party has shifted away from constitutional liberty and the government grew immensely under President Bush. I credit President Bush for many things most of which is his response to 9/11 and preventing more terrorists attacks on us. He also did much to protect pre-born babies. I do not believe Mr. Keyes is trying to get a name for himself. I believe he is genuinely concerned about the direction this country is moving in. If he had been the media darling (like Obama) during the primary he may be president right now.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
POWERED_BY