Hucks Army - Faith. Family. Freedom. [Grassroots] JOIN HUCKS ARMY | GET INVOLVED | FUNDRAISING | LINKS | LEADERSHIP | ABOUT
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2019 4:23 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:10 pm 
Offline
** General
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:21 pm
Posts: 1288
Location: Washington State
Likes: 0
Liked: 11
This seems very odd. Seems like there is something missing in this story.
Quote:
The Politicization of Justice: Kinston, North Carolina
Posted October 20th, 2009 at 1.55pm in Rule of Law.
The Washington Time’s lead story today is about the Justice Department’s objection to a change of elections in Kinston, North Carolina. Why is this an important story? Because it is another worrisome sign of how the Holder Civil Rights Division is using the Voting Rights Act to benefit a political party instead of to protect voters. Kinston is a majority black town, and in November of 2008 its citizens voted 2 to 1 to change their city council elections from partisan to nonpartisan. It is also a one party town – all elected members of the city council and the mayor are Democrats. Yet despite its overwhelming support by the voters of the town, the Civil Rights Division objected to the change to nonpartisan elections under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because it would potentially hurt Democratic candidates.

I wrote about this in September at National Review, but the Times story today is a must-read for newly-discovered details. Particularly relevant is the admission by a black member of the city council that “nothing is stopping black voters in Kinston from going to the polls” other than apathy. In other words, there are absolutely no barriers of any kind preventing blacks from voting, which is what the Voting Rights Act is intended to achieve. Even the head of the local NAACP expresses skepticism about DOJ’s involvement. The DOJ is improperly using the Voting Rights Act to guarantee that Democratic candidates win elections, rather than using it as intended to ensure that minority voters have the same opportunity as other voters to get to the polls and elect their candidate of choice.

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/20/the ... -carolina/

The full Washington Times story is here: Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:03 am 
Offline
***** General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:47 pm
Posts: 4564
Location: Texas
Likes: 554
Liked: 523
It was definitely a case of attempted affirmative action, but I read it at the Washington Times & people in the comments were all ranting about how the Administration is saying that blacks are too stupid to know how to vote without a (D) behind the candidate's name and that it is an insult to black people.

However, my understanding of it - please correct me if I'm wrong - is that the Admin is saying that whites there will not vote for a black candidate unless they are voting for the party rather than the individual. So in this scenario, it is the usual liberal insult of white people from the south as being inherently racist.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:33 am 
Offline
** General
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:21 pm
Posts: 1288
Location: Washington State
Likes: 0
Liked: 11
QuoVadisAnima wrote:
However, my understanding of it - please correct me if I'm wrong - is that the Admin is saying that whites there will not vote for a black candidate unless they are voting for the party rather than the individual. So in this scenario, it is the usual liberal insult of white people from the south as being inherently racist.
Yes that seems to be the original sentiment.

It will be interesting to watch and see if this scenario is repeated elsewhere.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
POWERED_BY