Hucks Army - Faith. Family. Freedom. [Grassroots] JOIN HUCKS ARMY | GET INVOLVED | FUNDRAISING | LINKS | LEADERSHIP | ABOUT
It is currently Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:27 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:03 am
Posts: 4844
Likes: 1174
Liked: 782
I, for one, believe that this year's RNC rules were more fair than in the past, including the rule to make the state's delegates proportional, as well as rules that let all the states have opportunity to have a voice. It looks like at this meeting in Arizona, the "people" will lose and the "establishment" will plot their candidate's premature crowning.

Quote:
GOP leaders gather in Arizona, ready to embrace Romney

Scottsdale, Arizona (CNN) -- Not too long ago, it seemed this week's meeting of the Republican National Committee in Arizona might be consumed with squabbles about delegate math and anxious hand-wringing over the long and acrimonious presidential primary fight.

Instead, it's looking more and more like a Mitt Romney pep rally in the making.

With Romney now on a sure path to the nomination thanks to the departure of his top rival, Rick Santorum, GOP leaders from every state will begin gathering Thursday at a posh Scottsdale resort to plot out general election strategy with the former Massachusetts governor as their standard-bearer.

Romney will address the meeting of state Republican Party chairmen at a Friday luncheon that is sure to be the event's biggest draw.

Later that evening, the presumptive nominee will venture into Phoenix raise money for the joint "Victory Fund" he established with the RNC. A minimum donation of $50,000 is being requested.

National party officials, stressing their neutrality even though the RNC and Romney campaign aides have already informally started planning their joint efforts for the general election, pointed out that Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were invited to the summit and will have emissaries here.

...
Ryder told CNN. "But I think a major focus of this meeting will be for people to start to come together behind the nominee and get ready for the contest in November."

Saul Anuzis, a national committeeman from Michigan, said the Romney speech on Friday should be a "rallying point" for Republicans in Scottsdale.

"This is an opportunity to bring the party together behind Romney and pull everyone toward the general election," said Anuzis, who endorsed the former Massachusetts governor early in the primary process.

Not every RNC member is ready to fall in line.

Some, such as Iowa National Committeeman Steve Scheffler, still harbor suspicions about Romney's conservative convictions and refuse to call him the nominee until he has accumulated the 1,144 delegates needed to secure the nomination.

"If and when he is the nominee, I will support him," Scheffler said. "But he is not the nominee. We are five months away from the convention or roughly that, so I don't think its bad thing for these other candidates to be in the race. Someone needs to hold Romney's feet to the fire on some of these issues."

...


The RNC, which for decades has been the main vehicle for Republican get-out-the-vote operations in presidential elections, is using the chairmen's meeting to showcase their plans for the race.

RNC political aides will brief state party leaders on their national campaign machinery, region by region. New technological initiatives will be unveiled. Committee finance officials will explain how they plan to keep pace with Obama's impressive fundraising muscle and fund the Tampa, Florida, convention.

There will be training sessions, speeches from Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer and Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, a political briefing hosted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz, and plenty of late night margaritas.

In the eyes of many RNC members, the Republican primary fight and the heated debates over new delegate rules that allowed the nomination process to drag on for months already seem like distant memories.

But they will still meet several times this week to evaluate what worked during the primary battle and what needs to be fixed.

"Having gone through the primary and seen where there were some holes and weaknesses, I think it's mainly the intention of our members to try and strengthen that up so there are fewer questions the next time around," said Arizona National Committeeman Bruce Ash, the chairman of the RNC Rules Committee.

Members will discuss the possibility of toughening penalties for primary states that violate RNC calendar rules.

They will also examine whether to tweak the delegate rules that governed the nomination process and sparked a series of mathematical disputes between Romney, Santorum, Gingrich and Paul.

At a meeting of the rules committee scheduled for Thursday, one amendment will be introduced to protect four early voting states -- Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada -- from penalties if they decide to move their contest dates without RNC approval.

Another proposed amendment would completely scrap the rule that some primary states allocate their delegates proportionally instead of "winner-take-all," a measure that lengthened the 2012 nomination fight by forcing the Republican candidates to hunt for delegates in more states than they did in 2008.


Even if the rules committee recommends changes to the 2016 nomination process, those adjustments would not face a formal vote until August, when the full RNC meets ahead of the party's national convention.

In the meantime, there is some consensus inside the committee that despite the damage done to Romney's approval ratings among certain key groups such as Hispanics and women, the primary process largely worked as it was supposed to work.

"I think amongst the members, they feel that the proportional rules have been to the benefit of properly vetting the candidates, and they feel that that's a good thing for the process," said one influential RNC member who did not want to be named revealing private discussions.

Ryder, the committeeman from Tennessee, said the extended primary battle was a boon to Romney.
"It gives his candidacy greater legitimacy than it would have had he been deemed the presumptive nominee after just a few early states in January," he said. "If that had been the result, there would have been a large number of Republican voters who would not have considered him to be a legit nominee. He had to compete. He won some, he lost some. But he won it fair and square.


"Fair and square" is debatable. Using millions of dollars to "destroy" your political opponents might seem fair to these politicians, but not to many decent Americans who do not believe lies and negative ads should be awarded with victory or praise.

If some of you are as upset with this snub to conservativism as I am, go to newt.org and give a gallon of gas to protest. This effort to crown Romney, even though he is far from getting the needed delegate count, denies the right of people in later states to have their say and have their vote matter.

_________________
Image



Post by justgrace Liked by: mxnwilson
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:34 pm 
Offline
Major General

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:01 pm
Posts: 736
Location: Lakewood, CO
Likes: 118
Liked: 147
I've been encouraging people I know who live in later states to go ahead and vote for Santorum. Either way, Santorum or Gingrich supporters should go ahead and vote their conscience. If Romney is the winner already why will it hurt him if he loses some votes in the later states? The reason it would hurt him is because he hasn't actually gained the needed delegates. If nothing else voting for either Santorum or Gingrich sends the message that Romney isn't who conservatives really wanted. We've got to keep pounding that message in for as long as possible.

_________________
Judith Martinez
"It is true poverty for a child to die so that we may live as we wish."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:36 pm 
Offline
** General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:42 pm
Posts: 1265
Location: McAlester, Ok
Likes: 173
Liked: 107
juditupp wrote:
I've been encouraging people I know who live in later states to go ahead and vote for Santorum. Either way, Santorum or Gingrich supporters should go ahead and vote their conscience. If Romney is the winner already why will it hurt him if he loses some votes in the later states? The reason it would hurt him is because he hasn't actually gained the needed delegates. If nothing else voting for either Santorum or Gingrich sends the message that Romney isn't who conservatives really wanted. We've got to keep pounding that message in for as long as possible.


Texas votes May 29. I'll vote for whoever is still on the ballot against Romney.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:15 pm 
Offline
Major General

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:01 pm
Posts: 736
Location: Lakewood, CO
Likes: 118
Liked: 147
Huckabeliever wrote:
juditupp wrote:
I've been encouraging people I know who live in later states to go ahead and vote for Santorum. Either way, Santorum or Gingrich supporters should go ahead and vote their conscience. If Romney is the winner already why will it hurt him if he loses some votes in the later states? The reason it would hurt him is because he hasn't actually gained the needed delegates. If nothing else voting for either Santorum or Gingrich sends the message that Romney isn't who conservatives really wanted. We've got to keep pounding that message in for as long as possible.


Texas votes May 29. I'll vote for whoever is still on the ballot against Romney.

As big as TX is if enough people actually did that it could still change the election.

_________________
Judith Martinez
"It is true poverty for a child to die so that we may live as we wish."



Post by juditupp Liked by: justgrace
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
POWERED_BY