Hucks Army - Faith. Family. Freedom. [Grassroots] JOIN HUCKS ARMY | GET INVOLVED | FUNDRAISING | LINKS | LEADERSHIP | ABOUT
It is currently Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:47 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:29 pm 
Offline
Major General
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:32 pm
Posts: 670
Location: Mansfield Center, CT
Likes: 17
Liked: 12
Quote:
Monday, December 6, 2010

Missouri Republican Numbers

Sarah Steelman's going to have an up hill battle to win the Republican Senate nomination in Missouri if Jim Talent decides to make the race. A PPP poll of GOP voters in the state conducted last week found 53% would like Talent to be their nominee against Claire McCaskill while 26% said Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder (more likely to run for Governor) would be their first choice and only 17% picked Steelman.

Part of the reason for Talent's initial advantage is name recognition. 68% of Republican primary voters know enough about him to have an opinion, while only 38% have one about Steelman. With folks who know Steelman- whether they like her or not- Talent's advantage over her is only 40-28. Those numbers suggest that once Steelman becomes better known the margin between her and Talent will tighten.

Talent is overwhelmingly well liked by the GOP electorate with 55% of voters having a favorable opinion of him to only 13% with an unfavorable one. Noteworthy within his numbers is that he's actually slightly more popular with conservatives at this point (57/11) than he is with moderates (49/18). If Steelman's goal is to provide an alternative to Talent from the right she's going to have a lot of work to do to convince conservatives who currently like him that she'd be a better choice.

All of that said if there's one thing we learned from this year's Republican primary season it's that the nature of these races can change very fast and that someone who once seemed out of the running can catch a head of steam even in just the final month of an election and come out on top. So Steelman has plenty of room to grow and time to gain on Talent.

When it comes to the 2012 Republican Presidential nomination picture in Missouri Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin are out ahead of the pack with 27% and 25% respectively. Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney are a good deal back with 15% and 14%, followed by Ron Paul at 5%, Tim Pawlenty at 3%, John Thune at 2%, and Mitch Daniels at 1%.

Only 47% of Republican primary voters in Missouri have a favorable opinion of Romney, well below the 76% who like Huckabee, 72% who like Palin, and even the 57% who see Gingrich positively. Romney's poor performance is symbolic of an emerging trend in our 2012 polling- he tends to be a lot stronger in states that Barack Obama won in 2008 than he is in ones that went for John McCain. That's a double edged sword for him- he's frequently putting up general election numbers that make him look like the the most formidable nominee the Republicans could put forward. But at the same time his path to getting that nomination looks difficult with red state Republicans much less enthusiastic about Romney than the other folks in the game.

Continuing a trend we pointed out in Montana on Friday, Huckabee leads Palin 32-26 with women while Palin is up 24-22 on him with men. That's something we're seeing in a lot of states.

Full results here
Posted by Tom Jensen at 3:27 PM

http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com ... mbers.html


_________________
The happy Union of these States is a wonder; their Constitution is a miracle; their example the hope of Liberty throughout the world.
James Madison, September 1829


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:30 pm 
Offline
Major

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:11 pm
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Liked: 22
He is on a roll! Huckaboom!


http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com ... mbers.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:20 pm 
Offline
***** General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 1:52 pm
Posts: 4803
Location: Texas
Likes: 90
Liked: 259
Aron always does such a great job posting the numbers:

http://www.rightosphere.com/blog.php?us ... y_id=11181

Check out what Tom Jensen wrote:

"Only 47% of Republican primary voters in Missouri have a favorable opinion of Romney, well below the 76% who like Huckabee, 72% who like Palin, and even the 57% who see Gingrich positively. Romney's poor performance is symbolic of an emerging trend in our 2012 polling- he tends to be a lot stronger in states that Barack Obama won in 2008 than he is in ones that went for John McCain.

That's a double edged sword for him- he's frequently putting up general election numbers that make him look like the the most formidable nominee the Republicans could put forward.

But at the same time his path to getting that nomination looks difficult with red state Republicans much less enthusiastic about Romney than the other folks in the game." http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com ... mbers.html

_________________
ConservTexan

http://ilikemikehuckabee2012.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:22 am 
Offline
***** General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 1:52 pm
Posts: 4803
Location: Texas
Likes: 90
Liked: 259
Boy I really dislike NRO. They never mention Huckabee at all, and seem to be the new cheerleaders for Palin. So Huckabee tops another midwest/heartland poll and they discount hiim as not gaining new votes. scratch

Quote:
Missouri Mavericks for Palin?
December 7, 2010 7:11 P.M.
By Henry Olsen

The Democrat-leaning firm Public Policy Polling released a survey of 400 “usual Missouri Republican primary voters” yesterday that received a fair bit of attention for its finding regarding the 2012 Senate race. Of more interest, however, is the poll’s preliminary presidential primary findings. PPP found that Mike Huckabee led the 2012 pack with 27 percent, followed closely by Sarah Palin at 25 percent. Newt Gingrich received 15 percent, Mitt Romney scored 14 percent, Ron Paul received 5 percent, and Tim Pawlenty, Mitch Daniels, and John Thune trailed behind.

Now compare this with the 2008 Missouri GOP Presidential primary returns. This was a close three-way race, with John McCain winning with 33 percent, Huckabee trailing with 31.5 percent, Romney finishing third with 29 percent, and Ron Paul garnering 4.5 percent. Note that Huckabee and Paul receive in the PPP poll nearly exactly what each got in 2008. This suggests that they have maintained but not expanded their voter base — and that Mitt Romney has lost nearly half of his.

Here’s where it gets interesting. One could assume that Newt draws his 15 percent in the PPP poll largely from those who supported Romney in 2008 given the profile each candidate has. Indeed, Newt’s 15 percent plus Romney’s 14 percent exactly equals the 29 percent Romney received in 2008.

If this is true, that means that Sarah Palin is the heiress of the bulk of John McCain’s support. It will be interesting to see if this poll is an outlier or if support for one of the “two mavericks” is transferrable to the other nationwide. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/25 ... enry-olsen

_________________
ConservTexan

http://ilikemikehuckabee2012.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
POWERED_BY