Hucks Army - Faith. Family. Freedom. [Grassroots] JOIN HUCKS ARMY | GET INVOLVED | FUNDRAISING | LINKS | LEADERSHIP | ABOUT
It is currently Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:34 pm 
Major General
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:32 pm
Posts: 670
Location: Mansfield Center, CT
Likes: 17
Liked: 12
Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Obama looks good in Minnesota

Barack Obama would win Minnesota pretty easily if he had to run for reelection today and in a bit of a surprise his stiffest competition would come not from the state's Governor Tim Pawlenty, but from Mitt Romney.

Obama's not particularly popular in Minnesota. 49% of voters in the state approve of him while 46% disapprove. His numbers are pretty completely polarized with 89% of Democrats approving of him and 90% of Republicans disapproving. Independents are pretty closely divided but lean slightly in favor of the President's performance by a 48/44 spread.

Obama may not be overwhelmingly well liked but he's certainly seen more favorably by the state's voters than his potential Republican foes. Mike Huckabee has the best personal favorability scores with 37% of voters viewing him positively to 40% negatively. Romney's spread is 32/42, Newt Gingrich's is 30/52, and Sarah Palin's is 35/60.

Pawlenty will leave office as an unpopular Governor. 43% of voters in the state approve of him while 53% disapprove. Democrats are more unified in disliking Pawlenty (89% disapproval) than Republicans are in their favor of him (83% approval.) Beyond that independents disapprove of him by a 40/56 spread. The importance of Pawlenty's unpopularity shouldn't be underestimated in Democrats picking up the Minnesota Governor's office this year in an otherwise dreadful year for the party. While Democratic Gubernatorial candidates in many states were having to deal with the weight of an unpopular President and an unpopular Democratic Governor Mark Dayton benefited by having the impact of an an unpopular President at least partially balanced out by his opponent having to deal with the weight of an unpopular Republican Governor.

In the closest head to head match up for President Obama leads Romney 47-42. Doing next best is Pawlenty at a 51-43 disadvantage, followed by Huckabee at 50-40, Gingrich at 51-38, and Palin at 54-36.

Obama gets more than 90% of the Democratic vote against all five Republicans. His numbers with independents vary a good bit though, from a 2 point lead over Romney to a 12 point one over Huckabee and Pawlenty, an 18 point one over Gingrich, and a 25 point one over Palin. There's also a fair amount of variability in the willingness of Republicans to support their various possible nominees- 90% say they'd vote for Pawlenty, 87% would vote for Romney, 84% for Huckabee, 81% for Gingrich, and just 76% for Palin.

The bottom line: against any Republican nominee other than Romney, Obama would do as well or better than he did in Minnesota in 2008. And even against Romney Obama's lead is better than what Democrats were able to do in the state in 2000 and 2004. Obama's standing's going to have to get a lot worse or the Republican candidate field's going to have to get a lot better for Minnesota to be a swing state in 2012.

Full results here
Posted by Tom Jensen at 2:16 PM ... esota.html

The happy Union of these States is a wonder; their Constitution is a miracle; their example the hope of Liberty throughout the world.
James Madison, September 1829

PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:51 pm 
Major General

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:42 am
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Liked: 54
It looks like Pawlenty wouldn't be any help as the VP nominee in obtaining Minnesota.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:09 pm 

Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:27 am
Posts: 200
Location: New Ulm, MN
Likes: 40
Liked: 29
I think I will have to educate my fellow Minnesotans about Romney.

I don't know why so many are for Obama. Republicans had a good showing for some of the state offices.

Republican Tom Emmer just conceded today that he lost the gubernatorial race. He was 8-9 thousand votes short. Many called him a sore loser for not conceding sooner--similar to Norm Coleman and Al Franken in last year's senate race. Now we are stuck with Al Franken for five more years, and Governor Mark Dayton for who knows how long.

The thing about the Emmer/Dayton race is that in some places there were more votes cast than registered voters. Emmer wanted to pursue this, not necessarily because he thought he would win, but because that just isn't right. Our state supreme court would not allow the numbers to be reconciled--go figure that one. Our supreme court seems happy to legislate from the bench, and they want to be appointed rather than elected. We had a really good conservative who ran and lost in November. :( (He is one of those crazy judges who want to get back to following the constitution.)

"Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your paths." (Proverbs 3:5)

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: