I have a theory on these polls that I think is going on. Imagine you're the person being surveyed and the pollster says "I'm going to read off 17 names who are running for the GOP nomination" and they always start with whoever at the moment is in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc, place. No one wants to hear 17 names being read off to them, so when they hear a name in the first 2 or 3 mentioned, they voice support for one of them so they don't have to hear the whole list of names. This produces the same results in so many polls, IMO. I'd be willing to bet that if the order of names were changed up, you'd get differing results. I find it interesting that in the Reuters-Ipsos poll, which is done via an internet survey, and thus all the names are listed side by side, Huck did very well in.
Just a theory, but I'm sticking to it.
