Huck's Army Forum :: Faith, Family & Freedom
http://www.forum.hucksarmy.com/

CNBC debate criteria
http://www.forum.hucksarmy.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=27315
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Peter [ Sun Oct 18, 2015 4:11 pm ]
Post subject:  CNBC debate criteria

After the last two debates, my expectations are somewhat muted for this debate... :tinfoil

Quote:
CNBC, Republicans finalize debate format

(CNN)CNBC, the Republican National Committee and the GOP presidential campaigns have agreed to criteria for the October 28 primary debate in Boulder, Colorado.

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus tweeted that the parties have agreed to the following criteria: a two-hour debate, including commercials; a 30-second closing statement for each candidate; and a single, open-ended question at the beginning of the debate that each candidate will have the opportunity to answer.

The new criteria satisfies several of the campaigns' demands for opening and closing statements, as well a 120-minute cap on the debate time.


Full article: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/15/politics/trump-carson-cnbc-republican-debate-threaten-pullout/

Author:  justgrace [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CNBC debate criteria

Thanks, Peter, for sharing this. I think a shorter debate may be good as long as Gov. Huckabee gets a fair share of the time to answer the questions. Praying it will be much more positive for him this time.

Author:  goalieman [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CNBC debate criteria

Was just going to chime in on this topic and here there's already a thread for it! :)

One possibly good thing with this debates criteria of who gets to participate is that a candidate has to be polling at 3% or more to be included. Right now, according to RCP, Huck is at 3.2% and Paul, Christie and Kasich are all below the 3% threshold. Having only 7 candidates on stage and Huck being one of them will 1.) give him more time to talk, and 2.) give him legitimacy with voters who only pay attention when they watch debates. Huck just needs to keep polling at 3% or higher in the next few polls.

Author:  Peter [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 2:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CNBC debate criteria

goalieman wrote:
Was just going to chime in on this topic and here there's already a thread for it! :)

One possibly good thing with this debates criteria of who gets to participate is that a candidate has to be polling at 3% or more to be included. Right now, according to RCP, Huck is at 3.2% and Paul, Christie and Kasich are all below the 3% threshold. Having only 7 candidates on stage and Huck being one of them will 1.) give him more time to talk, and 2.) give him legitimacy with voters who only pay attention when they watch debates. Huck just needs to keep polling at 3% or higher in the next few polls.

I hope you are right, goalieman. I heard somewhere that 3% means you just need to be polling at 2,5% or higher, since your average will be rounded up to 3%...

I do like the fact that since Huck is now not an unknown commodity, like he was 8 years ago, a Huckaboom can happen at ANY moment. The fuel is there, it just needs a spark: An excellent debate performance, for example.

Author:  goalieman [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 1:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CNBC debate criteria

If they go with 2.5% or higher, Paul would make at the moment but Christie and Kasich would miss the cut. Two new polls out today by CNN and Monmouth with Huck at 5% and 4% respectively. In fact, Huck is ahead of the much ballyhooed Fiorina and Cruz in the CNN poll!! :shock:

Author:  Peter [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 2:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CNBC debate criteria

goalieman wrote:
If they go with 2.5% or higher, Paul would make at the moment but Christie and Kasich would miss the cut. Two new polls out today by CNN and Monmouth with Huck at 5% and 4% respectively. In fact, Huck is ahead of the much ballyhooed Fiorina and Cruz in the CNN poll!! :shock:


These polls are ridiculous(ly inaccurate). In polls conducted over the same time period, Rubio places 13% in one poll and 6% in another, Cruz 10% in one, 4% in another...

Bush is 5% in one and Huck is 4% in the same poll (Monmouth) - are there pundits asking for Bush to drop out?

Author:  goalieman [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CNBC debate criteria

Well, I puntificate and I say Bush should drop out! :lol:

Gallop isn't even polling the primaries anymore due to how difficult it is to get an accurate read on things. Polls are being used more to shape how people think than informing them of anything.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/